Description

Built for work for an image-processing application.

The less-than-stellar GPU is actually pretty overkill for what we need, but thought I'd show it off anyway.

Log in to rate comments or to post a comment.

Comments

  • 75 months ago
  • 4 points

The integrated graphics should perform about the same as the GT610...

  • 75 months ago
  • 4 points

Better actually. :p

  • 75 months ago
  • 1 point

about the same

  • 75 months ago
  • 1 point

Not really. According to this article, the Intel HD 4600 iGPU will beat the snot out of the GT 610 in every way.

  • 75 months ago
  • 1 point

I thought you were talking about the GT 610 :\

  • 75 months ago
  • 1 point

Yea...nope.

  • 75 months ago
  • 1 point

He must have needed the vram, if he got a 2GB version.

  • 75 months ago
  • 2 points

Great build dude... but that GT series GPU makes me cringe lol... even if the build is not meant for gaming.

  • 75 months ago
  • 2 points

No reason to invest in an more expensive GPU if all he's doing is CPU related work.

  • 75 months ago
  • 2 points

Thanks!

The GPU is awful, you're not wrong.

[comment deleted]
  • 75 months ago
  • 2 points

how come no after market cooler?

  • 75 months ago
  • 1 point

I'm not overclocking. It would be fun, but this is for a customer.

  • 75 months ago
  • 1 point

Nice build. Although that GPU... Maybe you could upgrade later if needed.

  • 75 months ago
  • 2 points

Thank you.

It's highly unlikely we'll need to upgrade it, I only used it instead of the integrated graphics because it was a customer requirement.

  • 75 months ago
  • 1 point

So what is this image-processing application?

  • 61 months ago
  • 1 point

That card is slow. I have the evga gt610 in my cheap pc

  • 75 months ago
  • 0 points

That GPU was worthless

  • 75 months ago
  • 4 points

Agreed, as above, I only used it instead of the integrated graphics because it was a customer requirement.

[comment deleted]