Description

The machine works fine. 2-way SLI on Nvidia GPU and AMD FX-9590 CPU with minor bottle neck that i can barely notice

Comments

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

What temps do you get with that water on ur 9590

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

idle temp is 20C max 25C with a push pull config. under load 50C to 60C {Image rendering and games} if air conditioner is on i get lower temp

  • 42 months ago
  • 2 points

under load 50C to 60C

What program are you using to monitor your temps?

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

That is the real question.

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

Gotta use that AMD Overdrive.

60C is way to low for a 9590.

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

i was using CPUID HWMonitor for monitoring , and i am shifting to NZXT CAM you should try it

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

The only way to get accurate temperatures with AMD CPU's is using AMD Overdrive.

http://www.tomshardware.com/faq/id-2122665/understanding-temperature-amd-cpus-apus.html

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

yeah i tried it before some youtubers researched on the some topics and find that there a temperature reading for a sensor near the CPU socket which is always high and temperature sensor on the chip it self with is always lower that the motherboard sensor. actually it make a little scene as the cooler base is always in contact with the chip and makes it cooler than surrounding { the sensor on the MB }

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

I kinda wish the windforce led was red, also would've been nice to have red ram sticks. just to go with the theme of the fans.

great build nonetheless.

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

thanks , it kills me too. but i trying to live with it

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

Clear red tape like you use to repair tail lights ! 3M

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

Nice looking rig dude +1

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

Could've gotten a 980ti and an i5 for far better performance without a bottleneck.

  • 42 months ago
  • 0 points

Wierdly the hints of blue in there look stunning!

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

I agree, they look great.

  • 42 months ago
  • 0 points

Why get a 200+ dollar motherboard + a 9590? I'm an AMD fanboy myself, but that money could be used to get a better CPU and motherboard like an I5.

  • 42 months ago
  • 2 points

i already have i7 4790k on a gigabyte black edition motherboard the comparison of the 2 rig's on autodesk 3D max rendering the amd rig always wins

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

Pretty sure he just wants to be different, and the 9590 is basically an i5 with more efficient "hyperthreading" (so more overall performance), at the cost of much more power consumption and heat... not worth it if you ask me, but the FX-8XXX lineup is very good for this.

  • 42 months ago
  • 2 points

actual i upgraded from a fx-8350 to fx-9590 performance is much better and noticeable and on CPU rendering (actual app not benchmark apps) it get a great performance even to a i7-4790k but in games performance the i7 always wins

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

Overclocking... Even I'm getting a new MOBO to OC my FX-8320E (it was cheap, OK?) to probably 4.7-4.8.

i7 costs a BIT more, by the way (like, $150).

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

False, The i5 performs better, and always will be the better performer.