add arrow-down arrow-left arrow-right arrow-up authorcheckmark clipboard combo comment delete discord dots drag-handle dropdown-arrow errorfacebook history inbox instagram issuelink lock markup-bbcode markup-html markup-pcpp markup-cyclingbuilder markup-plain-text markup-reddit menu pin radio-button save search settings share star-empty star-full star-half switch successtag twitch twitter user warningwattage weight youtube

Rise of the tomb raider?

strigoi1489

49 months ago

Is anyone skeptical on the minimum specs requirements? 6 gbs of ram? really

Comments

  • 49 months ago
  • 2 points

If it's anything based on the first Tomb Raider - it shouldn't need more than 4gb. The first game was fantastically optimised (still used as a benchmark standard) and I'm sure it will be the same for this one!

  • 49 months ago
  • 1 point

The first game was also designed to run on older consoles... the new game is meant for better hardware and can be sure to be designed around the idea of smoother edges and higher resolution textures.

  • 49 months ago
  • 1 point

sweet

  • 49 months ago
  • 1 point

Not really, there are quite a few recent releases like Fallouit 4 and Battlefront 3 and the new Ac that you can run on only 4GB of ram.

[comment deleted]
  • 49 months ago
  • 1 point

The minimum for star wars battlefront was 8gbs while the recommended was 16gbs. We all know that it doesn't use nearly that much ram. So am I skeptical? yeah sure why not.

Sort

add arrow-down arrow-left arrow-right arrow-up authorcheckmark clipboard combo comment delete discord dots drag-handle dropdown-arrow errorfacebook history inbox instagram issuelink lock markup-bbcode markup-html markup-pcpp markup-cyclingbuilder markup-plain-text markup-reddit menu pin radio-button save search settings share star-empty star-full star-half switch successtag twitch twitter user warningwattage weight youtube