add arrow-down arrow-left arrow-right arrow-up authorcheckmark clipboard combo comment delete discord dots drag-handle dropdown-arrow errorfacebook history inbox instagram issuelink lock markup-bbcode markup-html markup-pcpp markup-cyclingbuilder markup-plain-text markup-reddit menu pin radio-button save search settings share star-empty star-full star-half switch successtag twitch twitter user warningwattage weight youtube

Intel Core i7-7700K 4.2 GHz Quad-Core Processor

(304 Ratings, 4.7 Average)

Prices

Merchant Base Promo Shipping Tax Availability Total
$225.00 Free two-day shipping with Amazon Prime In stock $225.00 Buy
( 6 new from $225.00, 15 used from $113.02. Last updated 3 minutes ago. )

* Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon.com at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

* PCPartPicker may receive compensation for purchases made at participating retailers linked on this site. This compensation does not affect what products or prices are displayed, or the order of prices listed. Learn more here.

Price Alert

* Price alerts use your merchant selections and tax settings.)

* We do not issue price alerts for any Amazon price listings.

Specifications

Manufacturer

Intel

Part #

BX80677I77700K

Series

Intel Core i7

Microarchitecture

Kaby Lake

Core Family

Kaby Lake-S

Socket

LGA1151

Core Count

4

Performance Core Clock

4.2 GHz

Performance Core Boost Clock

4.5 GHz

L2 Cache

1 MB

L3 Cache

8 MB

TDP

91 W

Integrated Graphics

Intel HD Graphics 630

Maximum Supported Memory

64 GB

ECC Support

No

Includes Cooler

No

Packaging

Boxed

Lithography

14 nm

Includes CPU Cooler

No

Simultaneous Multithreading

Yes: Hyper-Threading

Price History

    * Amazon pricing is not included in price history graphs.

    Reviews

    Herpaderpaderp
    • 3 points
    • 8 months ago

    from completed build 2017 special

    The last desktop 4c/8t i7. Not worth it as it has no upgrade path, unless you’re into motherboard modding. Doesn’t officially support windows 11. Just go with 8th gen intel or newer.

    Saltssaumure
    • 3 points
    • 2 years 3 months ago

    from completed build Greeeeeeen.

    Solid CPU, still competitive in single-core performance with the much later 2600. Minus one star for being the last 4c8t i7, good riddance to that era.

    DAOKOfan
    • 3 points
    • 2 years 6 months ago

    Don't overpay for this in 2021/2022. It's insane to me seeing people continue to pay the price of an i5-12600K for these. Can still be a decent budget option if found for a low enough price (wouldn't go over $80 honestly, since it needs a beefier motherboard and cooler than an i3-10100 to deliver roughly the same performance).

    P-NAR
    • 3 points
    • 3 years 2 months ago

    When I bought it back in 2016 this was the bomb, however in 2021 I can't recommend it unless you get it pretty cheap.

    Markentus
    • 4 points
    • 3 years 7 months ago

    from completed build TARS

    A really good CPU even for its age the only downside is that temps get hot quite quickly.

    DaultonT
    • 12 points
    • 3 years 9 months ago

    from completed build Siege 2

    Only 4 cores, but still pretty strong with a good oc.

    meme8383
    • 2 points
    • 3 years 10 months ago

    At the time, this was a great CPU. It still is a great CPU and can support most modern graphics cards well, but it's no longer a top-of-the-line CPU with its outdated technology. No issues in 3 years (I haven't overclocked it at all), and the temps are fine with my Hyper 212 (72-75 under load, I also have 6 case fans). 3 years later, I haven't replaced thermal paste or anything, it scores 2268 on Cinebench (Their benchmark for this CPU is 2420).

    Jesska
    • 5 points
    • 3 years 10 months ago

    from completed build El cheapo 2017 evolved

    It's still fine considering Intel haven't chance IPC in 5 years and still remain competitive. Overclocked at 4.8 it's matching 3300X and beating 10320. In many games would actually perform within 2-3% of stock 10600k, so it's still too early for an upgrade. My chip though happened to be on the worse end it can't go higher than 4.8 at 1.370V, but temps under stress load are just 70

    However I almost wish I bought my PC in 2018 when 8700k was out lol Or 2019 when the whole spectrum of 3600/3700x/3900x was out

    DAOKOfan
    • 5 points
    • 3 years 10 months ago

    from completed build Customer Rig #9: Upgrade

    8700K came out a few months later and was so much better. This CPU still smashes games that only make good use of 4C/8T.

    Gsquared300
    • 4 points
    • 3 years 10 months ago

    from completed build Genesis

    Not a lot of cores but unreal clock speed. Pretty good for gaming, not great for virtualization or video rendering.

    Builds Using This Part

    • suspectlovemakersuspectlovemaker

      A Tiny Monster Gaming PC

      • Intel Core i7-7700K
      • GeForce GTX 1070

      $1083.97+

    • MinomirMinomir

      BlackMicrowave

      • Intel Core i7-7700K (@4.7GHz)
      • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

      $3333.33

    • CamaxideCamaxide

      4K Home Theatre Gaming Setup

      • Intel Core i7-7700K
      • GeForce RTX 4090

      $36058.98+